WARSAW, Poland 鈥� An appellate court in Poland on Monday rejected a lawsuit brought against two Holocaust scholars - one of them an Ottawa professor - in a case that has been closely watched because it was expected to serve as a precedent for research into the highly sensitive area of Polish behavior toward Jews during the Second World War.
Poland is governed by a nationalist conservative party that has sought to promote remembrance of Polish heroism and suffering during the wartime German occupation of the country. The party believes that discussions of Polish wrongdoing distort the historical picture and are unfair to Poles.
The Appellate Court of Warsaw argued in its explanation that it believed that scholarly research should not be judged by courts. But it appeared not to be the end: a lawyer for the plaintiff said Monday that she would appeal Monday's ruling to the Supreme Court.
The ruling was welcomed by the two researchers, University of Ottawa Prof. Jan Grabowski and Barbara Engelking, who declared it a 鈥済reat victory鈥� in a Facebook post.
"We greet the verdict with great joy and satisfaction all the more, that this decision has a direct impact on all Polish scholars, and especially on historians of the Holocaust,鈥� they said.
Monday's ruling comes half a year after 聽the two researchers to apologize to a woman who claimed that her deceased uncle had been defamed in a historical work they edited and partially wrote, 鈥淣ight Without End: The Fate of Jews in Selected Counties of Occupied Poland.鈥澛�
Lawyers for the niece, 81-year-old Filomena Leszczynska, argued that her uncle was a Polish hero who had saved Jews, and that the scholars had harmed her good name and that of her family by suggesting the uncle was also involved in the killing of Jews.
The plaintiffs鈥� lawyer, Monika Brzozowska-Pasieka, said in an emailed statement to The Associated Press that Leszczynska was 鈥渁stonished鈥� by the judgement and intends to file an appeal to the Polish Supreme Court.
Brzozowska-Pasieka stressed that Leszczynska thinks that the depiction of her uncle in the book was defamatory and that the historians "failed to conduct their research with due diligence.鈥�
鈥淲e want to emphasize that the right to academic freedom, including the right to carry out historical research and publish its results, is subject to legal protection (but) this protection does not cover statements that do not pass the test of reliability,鈥� the statement said.
Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center applauded the court ruling, calling it "an incredible win" for all who support Holocaust research.
"We are hopeful that this ruling sets a precedent to protect scholars and support Holocaust research and education at a time when we need it most," the group's president, Michael Levitt, said in a statement.
Some researchers and others feared that if the researchers were punished, it could have a chilling effect and dissuade young scholars from taking up the sensitive issue of Polish behavior toward the Jews in the Second World War.
Poland was occupied by Nazi Germany during the war and its population subjected to mass murder and slave labor. Yet amid the more than five years of occupation, there were also some Poles who betrayed Jews to the Germans or took part in their killing, while other Poles risked their lives to save Jews.聽
The topic of Polish crimes against Jews was taboo during the communist era and new revelations of Polish wrongdoing in recent years have sparked a backlash.
Poland's current ruling Law and Justice party has vowed to fight what it considers unfair depictions of Polish wrongdoing. Many researchers and the Israeli government have accused the Polish government of historical whitewashing.
Vanessa Gera, The Associated Press
