Dear Editor
Mr. Pattinson, in his letter (Credit Union CUPlex Mathematics 101, March 9 News-Optimist), said, "the people who weren't paying attention to the capital expenditure being promoted by a majority of city counicl had better start.
One could take those words as a deliberate effort to attempt to scare those people he appears to target.
Then Mr. Pattinson wades into why he is sending out his warning. His figures dwell on worst-case scenarios and his version of the City's financial situation. This reads: Mr. Pattinson fears debt, but is not valuing assets.
He quoted statistics about Lloydminster's recreational facilities, including their relatively new Commonwealth Centre and speaks of their accumulated "deficit." We, as citizens, including Mr. Pattinson, were all clearly advised very early on that the CUPlex would not be 100 per cent cost recovery. Many people also know our existing community recreational facilities are operated at less than cost recovery. Hand wringing will not make it less so. If he wanted to be helpful, he could, as an example, advocate the development of a great business plan for the CUPlex. Community leaders would applaud such a suggestion.
He further states, "it appears citizens who question the road we are heading down are marginalized by a majority of council." I believe the "majority of council," but more importantly, all of council, are especially able to think prudently. This current council's decision speaks of courage. They did not take it lightly, they did not vote unanimously, but the decision is now a matter of record.
It appears Mr. Pattinson is continuing to attempt to drive a wedge by stating in his letter: "promoted by a majority of council." This statement is too consistent with a favourite pastime of citizens in any community - the act of censoring a council's decisions and deliberations. Some believe this has been elevated to a fine art around this community.
Yes, strenuous debate and complete information makes for good, well understood decisions. And yet, one needs to comprehend that this is a sensitive period in the life of our city. Paid officials and volunteers are advocating the CUPlex facility as a blend of quality of life and an economic driver for our city. The nature of Mr. Pattinson's expression is hurtful to volunteer effort and financial donor inspiration. Such effort and financial contributions will help make the project successful, for which, surely he would be pleased.
To make our project work, we all need to support the idea that this is an investment for us, our children and grandchildren. Sure, all that we do for our children and grandchildren sometimes does not make absolute economic sense. We citizens in 2011, have the opportunity to build into this city a facility that will be a positive determinant in where or children and grandchildren desire to live. With all 14,000 residents becoming truly neighbours, we can make the project happen and be a long term success.
Owen Bannerman
North Battleford
