Â鶹´«Ã½AV

Skip to content

Social-media creators, podcasts won't be regulated under Liberal online streaming law

OTTAWA — The Liberal government has released its final policy direction for the Online Streaming Act, requiring digital giants to contribute to Canadian content while leaving individual content creators alone.
20231114111120-65539eeb51418b38dfce2085jpeg
This combination of 2017-2022 photos shows the logos of Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and Snapchat on mobile devices. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP

OTTAWA — The Liberal government has released its final policy direction for the Online Streaming Act, requiring digital giants to contribute to Canadian content while leaving individual content creators alone.

The controversial legislation aims to modernize Canada's broadcasting regime. Canadian content has benefited from billions of dollars contributed by those broadcasting on TV, radio, cable and satellite, but Canadians are increasingly consuming content online.

On Tuesday, the Department of Canadian Heritage issued its final direction to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission on the legislation in order to scope in streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon, YouTube and Apple because they also broadcast commercial content.

This marks the end of the government's direct role with the law formerly known as Bill C-11, the Liberal government's second attempt to bring major online-streaming services into Canada's broadcasting system and eventually have them contribute to supporting local music and stories.

"The sector needs to adapt to where the Canadian public is today. And we know Canadians look for their news and content online," Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge said Tuesday in Montreal.

"This is a really important step to modernize this sector and to make sure that our Canadian voices are strong and alive in the online world."

The final policy direction, which is binding, will apply to broadcast services, not content creators. That means those producing content on social media, podcasts and video games will not be regulated under the law, the policy direction shows.

The CRTC has also said it will not regulate content creators, whether they upload makeup tutorials, review restaurants, dance to music trends, promote their local business, or criticize the government.

The Department of Canadian Heritage said the act targets the kind of professional, licensed commercial content that is found in traditional broadcasting, such as TV and radio.

The possibility that content creators would fall within the scope of the Online Streaming Act had sparked a strong reaction, including from the Opposition Conservatives, who had argued it would amount to censorship — a claim St-Onge denies.

The New Democrats and Bloc Québécois had supported the bill.

While the implementation of the law is years away, it will require online broadcasters to contribute to the creation, production and distribution of Canadian content without changing their algorithms.

It also seeks to support Indigenous content and original French-language programming.

On Tuesday, the Conservatives promised to repeal the act should they form government, arguing that imposing Canadian content rules on online-streaming services still amounts to overreach.

"Instead of removing barriers and giving creators and consumers freedom, the Liberal government is telling homegrown talent they will not succeed unless they meet the approval of government bureaucrats in Ottawa," Conservative MP Rachael Thomas, the heritage critic for her party, said in a written statement.

The CRTC is now tasked with creating the regulations, which will include major public consultations over defining, or redefining, Canadian content. This will include speaking with Indigenous, ethnocultural groups and official language minority communities.

Once a definition is in place, the CRTC has said it will start looking at streaming companies to see whether the new broadcasting rules will apply to them or not. But that is still years away.

Since the law follows years of consultations, St-Onge said, the final policy direction is similar to the draft version from earlier this year.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 14, 2023.

— With files from Jacob Serebrin in Montreal.

Mickey Djuric, The Canadian Press

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks